Vin Diesel’s Dom Toretto is leading a quiet life off the grid with Letty and his son, little Brian, but they know that danger always lurks just over their peaceful horizon. This time, that threat will force Dom to confront the sins of his past if he’s going to save those he loves most. His crew joins together to stop a world-shattering plot led by the most skilled assassin and high-performance driver they’ve ever encountered: a man who also happens to be Dom’s forsaken brother, Jakob (John Cena, next year’s The Suicide Squad).
F9 sees the return of Justin Lin as director, who helmed the third, fourth, fifth and sixth chapters of the series when it transformed into a global blockbuster. The action hurtles around the globe—from London to Tokyo, from Central America to Edinburgh, and from a secret bunker in Azerbaijan to the teeming streets of Tblisi. Along the way, old friends will be resurrected, old foes will return, history will be rewritten, and the true meaning of family will be tested like never before.
The film stars returning cast members Michelle Rodriguez, Tyrese Gibson, Chris “Ludacris” Bridges, Jordana Brewster, Nathalie Emmanuel and Sung Kang, with Oscar® winner Helen Mirren and Oscar® winner Charlize Theron. F9 also features Grammy-winning superstar Cardi B as new franchise character Leysa, a woman with a connection to Dom’s past, and a cameo by Reggaeton sensation Ozuna.
MLB Network ran a poll asking who is presently the best pitcher in the major league baseball. The obvious answer is Jacob deGrom, the winner of two consecutive National League Cy Young awards. Will he win a third straight?
The answer is no. Why? In two words, Mickey Callaway. The former New York Mets manager had a lot to do with deGrom’s success these past two seasons. For all his foibles as a manager, Callaway is a pitching guru.
Before becoming the manager of the Mets, Callaway was the pitching coach for the Cleveland Indians. Corey Kluber won two Cy Young awards with the Indians when Callaway was the pitching coach. Indians manager Terry Francona attributed the Indians World Series appearance to Callaway’s ability to prepare the pitching staff for games and in-game adjustments. Unfortunately, for Callaway, as a manager he often made the incorrect in-game adjustment which led to his dismissal as the Mets manager.
How much of a difference did Callaway make in deGrom’s performance? Let’s examine the FACTS. In 2017, deGrom’s ERA was 3.53. In 2018, the first year under Callaway’s tutelage, he recorded a microscopic ERA of 1.70, more than half the prior years. deGrom followed up 2018’s performance with another Cy Young and an ERA of 2.43, still more than a run per game better than 2017’s number.
You may say 2017 was an off year for deGrom. Okay, I will bite on that argument. Let’s examine the years prior. In 2016, he had an ERA of 3.04. In 2015, he had an ERA of 2.54. Do you see a pattern? In the years preceding Callaway’s arrival, deGrom’s ERA was going in the wrong direction. It was increasing every year per half a run.
Let me be clear. I am not arguing that the Mets should have retained Callaway as the Mets manager. As I previously noted, he was awful at in-game adjustments as a manager. But, as a pitcher’s friend, there is no one better. If you are looking for the best pitcher in baseball in 2020, examine the Anaheim Angels pitching staff. Callaway is their new pitching coach. That is where your 2020 American League Cy Young winner resides.
TMZ is reporting that Los Angeles Lakers legend Kobe Bryant was killed this morning in a helicopter crash in Calabasas , California.
The news temporarily brought down the TMZ and Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department sites due to traffic.
This is a rapidly developing story. Check your news source for more details
1917 – the saga of Lance Corporals Schofield and Blake, two young men given a seemingly impossible mission: to deliver a message—deep in the heart of enemy territory—that, if successful, would potentially save the lives of 1,600 British soldiers.
THE BACKSTORY (Courtesy of Universal)
Before the United Nations was formed, prior to NATO—well before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand set off a chain of events that would draw the world into conflict—nations in the West had primarily acted in their own interests. Never before had countries set aside nationalism for the collective greater good. For that reason, the First World War in many ways unified the West and became the bedrock of modern society.
A global shockwave that made humanity confront our common ground, our joint ideals and shared values, World War I demanded unthinkable sacrifice—calling upon a tested generation’s honor, duty and fidelity to country. The impact of the war, and particularly its effect on the young soldiers asked to rise up and defend their homelands, has intrigued filmmaker Sam Mendes since he was a boy.
The idea for 1917 was sparked by stories that Mendes’ grandfather, the late Alfred H. Mendes, shared about his time as a Lance Corporal in the First World War, as well as the colorful characters he met during his service. In the year 1917, Alfred was a 19-year-old who enlisted in the British Army. Due to his small stature, the five-foot-four-inch soldier was chosen to be a messenger on the Western Front.
The mist on No Man’s Land—the unclaimed land between Allied and enemy trenches on the frontlines that neither side crossed for fear of being attacked—hung at approximately five and a half feet, so the young sprinter was able to carry messages laterally from post to post. His height meant he was not visible to the enemy, and he literally ran for his life. During the war, Alfred was injured and gassed, and was awarded a medal for his bravery. In his later years, the Trinidadian novelist retired to his birthplace in the West Indies, where he wrote his memoirs.
“I was always fascinated by the Great War, perhaps because my grandfather told me about it when I was very young, and perhaps also because at that stage of my life, I’m not sure I’d even registered the concept of war before,” Mendes says. “Our film is fiction, but certain scenes and aspects of it are drawn from stories he told me, and ones told him by his fellow soldiers. This simple kernel of an idea—of a single man carrying a message from one place to another—stayed with me and became the starting point for 1917.”
Mendes spent time researching first-person accounts of this era, many of which are held at the Imperial War Museum in London. As he took notes, Mendes began to compile fragments of stories of bravery confronting terror; in time, he began to dovetail them into a single tale.
During this exploration, he discovered that World War I was so wholly entrenched in a relatively small geographic area that it had very few long journeys. “It was a war mainly of paralysis,” Mendes says, “one in which millions lost their lives over 200 or 300 yards of land. People are justly celebrated in all parts of the world for gaining tiny sections of land in World War I. In the Battle of Vimy Ridge, for example, they gained 500 yards, but it remains one of the war’s greatest acts of heroism. So, the question I asked myself was how to tell a story about a single epic journey, when essentially nobody traveled very far.”
His research stalled momentarily; Mendes soon discovered what would become the backdrop for his tale. In 1917, the Germans retreated to what was known as Siegfriedstellung, or the Hindenburg Line. After six months of planning and digging a huge trench system of defenses and deep-lying artillery, the Germans placed a vast number of troops—once spread over the original, much longer, front line—into a new, enormously fortified, condensed line of defense.
The filmmaker discusses how he found the propulsive narrative of what would become his greatest challenge to date. “There was a brief period where, for several days, the British didn’t know whether the Germans had retreated, withdrawn or surrendered,” Mendes says. “Suddenly, the British were cut adrift in a land they had literally spent years fighting over…but had never seen before. Much of it was destroyed by the Germans, who left nothing of lasting value, destroying anything that might sustain the enemy. Anything of beauty was taken or destroyed; villages, towns, animals, food. All trees were cut down. It was made relatively impassible. The British were alone in this desolate land full of snipers, land mines and trip wires.”
Inspired by the fragments of stories from his grandfather, the first-person accounts he had researched at the Imperial War Museum—as well as the idea of the deadly venture to the Hindenburg Line—Mendes crafted the structure of the story that became 1917. “Like most of the war stories I admired, from All Quiet on the Western Front to Apocalypse Now, I wanted to create a fiction based on fact,” Mendes says. He reached out to frequent collaborator Krysty Wilson-Cairns, who, unbeknownst to Mendes at the time, is a self-proclaimed “history nerd” and was ideally suited to the material, and their journey began.
Like Mendes, Harris has a personal connection to this epoch. When she was in her twenties, she edited the letters of Rupert Brooke—a poet who was engaged to her grandmother before dying in the war. “Having edited those letters, I looked in detail at the First World War—at the appalling loss of life, and what it meant for those young men going out who had no idea,” Harris says. “I think nobody in Britain at the time had any idea what war was really about. It was the first time that, through poetry and the writings of people on the front, people back home started to have a clear idea of what was actually going on.”
Pippa Harris is Mendes’ longtime producing partner at their Neal Street Productions and the two have known each other since childhood. Mendes and Harris were rapt by Wilson-Cairns’ meticulous detailing and deft ability with character. Building upon their shared history, Wilson-Cairns worked closely with Mendes as they put onto the page precisely what he needed for shooting.
Through weaving a story of two exhausted young men in a terrifying, extreme situation, Mendes and Wilson-Cairns tell a story that speaks of the grit of a generation tested by the atrocities of war. Wilson-Cairns found something inherently fascinating about the fact that the global powers of the era seemed helpless to stop the carnage. “World War I was the first war of wholesale slaughter,” Wilson-Cairns says. “It was the first mechanical war in a sense that it represented the first meeting of industry and war. What starts with infantry charges and horses quickly becomes a static war fought with tanks, machine guns, gas and planes. So, it was death at an unprecedented level. One of the most extraordinary things about World War I is that, for four years, 10 million people killed each other and at no point did anyone say, ‘Enough.’”
Ultimately, the film pays tribute not just to World War I soldiers but to all our military members, past and present and their sacrifice for the greater good and pursuit of freedom.
Very few US cities were hit as hard by the Great Recession as Las Vegas. The severe economic downturn forced the city’s casino operators to adjust their business model. The entertainment capital of the world was built on gambling. The sudden evaporation of high rollers and their liquid assets pouring into the casinos crushed the local economy. The thriving nightclub operators’ business model built on high-end bottle service and triple-digit cover fees for men was upended. How would Las Vegas recover?
Revenue streams, which were once ancillary, would soon become extremely valuable. Aging pop and rock stars, or those in need of a career resurrection, took up extensive residencies performing two shows a night, up to five nights a week. Pop culture icons such as Britney Spears and Celine Dion would force fans to the Las Vegas strip to see them perform. Rock stars like Motley Crue and Elton John would bring in the Baby Boomers who long ago hung up their party shoes. It was as if Las Vegas rediscovered the Rat Pack Las Vegas business model; a time when Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, and Sammy Davis Jr. would bring in the crowds with their Vegas strip shows.
And while the money flow on the gaming tables was reduced to a trickle from the high-flying days of the 90s and 2000s, the sportsbook revenues grew steadily. This was in large part thanks to the explosion in fantasy football and the accompanying growth in the population of the NFL. Twenty-five dollar and hundred-dollar blackjack players were now redistributing their discretionary funds into the sportsbooks. The revenue growth from the residencies and the sportsbook kept Las Vegas afloat until it rose again.
And, in the latter part of the recent decade, it began to rise. The economy slowly grew stronger. Professional sports finally came to Sin City with the NHL expansion club the Las Vegas Golden Knights.